Guides for Managing Silica Control Programs in Construction
|
|
|
|
Overview
Project Timetable
Section 1: Planning
- Who is Responsible for Planning
- What Plans Need to be Made
- When to Plan
Section 2: Writing a Site Specific
Compliance Program
Section 3: Implementing - Managing the Control Plan
- Making the Control Plan Work
Section 4: Evaluating
Section 5: Silica Controls Selection Chart
Section 6: Checklists
Checklist 1: Site Inspection (for all controls)
Checklist 2: Cleaning Up Debris with HEPA Vacuum
Miniaturized Checklist 1: Site Inspection
Note to the User:
Engineering and work practice controls for lead
dust are widely available and in common use.
This is not the case for crystalline silica. We
recommend that contractors engaging in silica
dust generating tasks:
1. Develop a site-specific silica compliance
program for managing engineering and work
practice controls.
2. Use engineering and work practice controls for
silica-generating tasks, even though they might
not always be readily available. Water and a
spray can, of course, are not hard to find.
Suggestions are provided on where to look for
controls. As is often the case in construction, a
little creativity can go a long way. |
Why institute an engineering and work practice control program?
- The OSHA Special Emphasis Program (SEP) requires that
contractors use engineering and work practice controls to reduce
exposure to the lowest level practical.
- Required by some owners in initial project bid documents.
- Worker exposure can be reduced or eliminated by:
- engineering controls, such as a vacuum attachment to a
pneumatic hammer
- work practice controls such as spraying water before
performing any silica generating activities
Overview of the Tasks
1. Planning
a) Select a Silica Program Manager
b) Identify silica dust generating tasks
c) Select control methods
d) Schedule implementation
e) Develop a silica compliance program
2. Writing a site specific program
3. Implementing
a) Managing the control plan
b) Making the control plan work
4. Evaluating
a) Assess effectiveness of controls
— This Guide will elaborate on these tasks —
Owner issues bid documents with specifications for worker protection
from crystalline silica.
Bid awarded; contract includes provisions for silica dust control plan.
Contractor develops initial compliance program.
Project starts. Contractor develops site-specific silica health & safety
program; engineering and work practice controls in place.
Silica Program Manager (SPM) reviews silica air monitoring results and
makes regular site inspections.
SPM assesses effectiveness of controls and tries other strategies if
necessary. Updates compliance program.
Project complete. SPM reviews effectiveness of controls. Owner modifies
specifications for future projects, if necessary.
Planning the engineering and work practice control program is
part and parcel of project planning. A timeline for the planning
stage looks something like this:
Owner issues bid documents with specifications for worker protection
from crystalline silica.
Bid awarded; contract includes provisions for silica control plan.
Contractor develops initial OSHA compliance program.
Who is responsible for planning
- Can be any of the following:
- Project planners
- Managers
- Company health and safety officer
- Silica Program Manager (SPM)
- Union superintendent
What plans need to be made
- Assign a SPM to organize and run the program (usually assigned by
central office or project manager).
- Identify silica-generating tasks
- Select one or several control options for each task. See the Silica Controls
Selection Chart in Section 5.
- On most rehabilitation projects a combination of controls may be
necessary.
- When selecting controls consider site-specific factors and schedules
(e.g. are there factors which make the use of water undesirable -
temperature, slip hazards).
- Prepare a Compliance Program.
When to plan
- Methods of controlling silica dust should be included in the initial project
plans.
- Planners should look at the different silica disturbing tasks and select
the best control options available to them.
The compliance program describes the engineering and work practice controls
used at the site and includes records of compliance activities. The written program
should include:
- Introduction: Project description, location, scope and schedule
of work.
- Personnel: Project Manager, Silica Program Manager or industrial
hygienist.
- Silica dust-emitting activities: Describe tasks, equipment, materials
used, work crew.
- Engineering and work practice controls: Describe type of control,
equipment, use and maintenance procedures. Include rationale for selecting
each control and alternative technologies considered.
- Personal air monitoring results: Provide industrial hygiene reports
and air sampling results for silica dust-emitting activities. Refer to the
Guide for Managing Exposure Assessment.
- Schedule: Provide timetable for implementing compliance program.
- Interim controls: Describe respiratory protection and other controls
that will be used for each task. Refer to the Guide for Managing
Respiratory Protection
- Hygiene procedures: Describe protective clothing and equipment,
housekeeping, clean areas, showers, and hand washing stations.
- Worker rotation schedule: (if applicable).
Attach the following programs and records:
- Respirator Program: Provide written program and identify program
administrator, include respirator type selected for each task, records for
training, fit testing, and medical clearances.
- Training: Schedules, topics covered and records.
Section 2 Notes
- Information on controls is
available from a variety of
sources. See the Resource
List.
-
The written compliance
program must be revised
& updated periodically to
reflect the current status
of the program.
|
Managing the Control Plan
Each of the activities listed below requires periodic inspection by the SPM.
A timeline for control implementation looks something like this:
Project starts. Interim controls in place; contractor develops site-specific
silica health & safety program; engineering and work practice controls
in place.
SPM reviews silica air monitoring results and makes regular site inspections.
Making the control plan work:
- Check that control equipment and supplies are on site before
silica dust disturbing tasks begin.
- Train workers and supervisors on how to use control equipment.
- Inspect site frequently to ensure that controls are:
- present at the location where the tasks will be performed on
any given day
- in operating order
- being used when they should be
- being used properly (provide additional training if necessary)
- effective (that is controlling dust emissions)
Use the Silica Controls Selection Chart in Section 5.
Section 6 contains Checklists that can be used by the SPM for conducting
inspections.
Section 3 Notes
- Selecting a control is the
first step in protecting
workers from silica containing
dust - making it
work is the second. A control
program must be
closely managed to be
effective. For each control
selected, the SPM should
consider exposure factors,
work procedures and
should evaluate the effectiveness
of the control.
Weekly toolbox talks are a
good time to review the
use of new tools or controls.
- Caution: Performing silica
dust disturbing activities
in an enclosed or confined
space may greatly increase
exposure.
|
Evaluating the control program is an ongoing activity as shown in the time
line below.
Contractor assesses effectiveness of controls and tries other strategies if
necessary. Updates compliance program.
Project complete. SPM reviews effectiveness of controls. Owner modifies
specifications for future projects, if necessary.
There are 2 ways to evaluate whether the control program is working:
- Site inspections of the controls - use Checklists in Section 6
- Monitoring worker exposure to airborne silica dust while a control is
being used (see Guide for Managing Exposure Assessment).
If the evaluation indicates a potential problem with a control check
these possibilities:
- Control is not appropriate for the job. Seek an alternate control.
- Control is not functioning properly.
- Workers are not using control properly.
Section 4 Notes
- Upon completion of the
project, it is advisable to
prepare a final effectiveness
report for future
projects.
|
Task/Tool |
Control |
Notes |
| Abrasive blasting |
Substitute for sand |
- Alternate blasting agents with dust suppressant additives are widely
available.
- Some, such as coal slag, might contain toxic materials
|
| Jackhammer, pneumatic chipping gun |
Wetting, vacuum attachment |
- Attachments that provide a fine water spray are currently being
developed.
- Operators can also wet the surfaces with water from spray can,
watering truck or hose prior to chipping.
- Care must be taken since some surfaces may not absorb water and
frequent spraying may be necessary.
- Some workers don’t like wetting because they can’t see the work.
Depending upon the location and/or time of year water can be a slip
hazard due to mud or ice.
- Vacuum attachments are available but not widely used.
|
| Pneumatic drill |
Wetting, vacuum attachment |
- Water hose attachments are available
- Refer to above for additional options.
|
| Power saws |
Wetting |
- Attachments for concrete saws are available and in use.
|
| Rock crusher |
Wetting, distancing |
- Hose/spray assemblies available for wetting dust generated during
rock crushing.
- Remote control devices can help reduce operator exposure.
|
| Grinder, tuck pointing |
Wetting, vacuum attachment |
- Vacuum attachment available although not widely used.
- Wetting of surfaces works but often discouraged because of surface
run-off and slurry created.
|
| Operating heavy equipment |
Air-conditioned cab with HEPA filters |
- Keep doors, windows closed and air conditioning filter on.
|
| Cleaning surfaces and clothing |
HEPA vacuums, water spray |
- Compressed air should not be used to clean surfaces
or clothing.
- Mechanical cleaning machines not using water will create
dust clouds.
- Use vacuum for smaller size debris, a shovel should be used
for larger pieces that may clog the vacuum.
- Maintain adequate vacuum capacity.
- Use prefilters to extend the service life of HEPA filters.
|
| General work area |
Water truck with spray nozzles |
- Frequent spraying of work area to keep surface damp
|
Suggestion on using checklists: since these lists are short, they can be made smaller and placed or pasted into
field notebooks. For instance, Checklist 1 could be miniaturized - see example at end of checklists. They can
also be programmed onto a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant).
CHECKLIST 1. SITE INSPECTION (for all controls)
| Controls are: |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| Available at work location |
|
|
|
| In operating order |
|
|
|
| Used when they should be |
|
|
|
| Used properly (workers trained in their use) |
|
|
|
| Effective in controlling dust emissions |
|
|
|
CHECKLIST 2. CLEANING UP DEBRIS WITH HEPA VACUUM
| |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| Vacuum is operated as per
manufacturer's instructions |
|
|
|
| Large pieces of debris have been
picked up with shovel prior to use of
vacuum (so that vacuum doesn't get
clogged). |
|
|
|
| Adequate vacuum capacity maintained |
|
|
|
| Prefilters in place |
|
|
|
| Wide mouthed attachments and rigid
wands in use. Workers able to operate
vacuum without stooping over |
|
|
|
| Collection bags in place, bags
disposed of properly |
|
|
|
MINIATURIZED CHECKLIST 1. SITE INSPECTION (for all controls)
| Controls are: |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| Available at work location |
|
|
|
| In operating order |
|
|
|
| Used when they should be |
|
|
|
| Used properly (workers trained in their use) |
|
|
|
| Effective in controlling dust emissions |
|
|
|
Back to Guides for Managing Crystalline Silica Control Programs in Construction
This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author
and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an
information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of
information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.
© 2004 by The Mount Sinai — Irving J. Selikoff Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine
|
|