Guides for Managing Lead Control Programs in Construction
|
|
|
|
Overview
Project Timetable
Section 1: Planning
- Who is Responsible for Planning
- What Plans Need to be Made
- When to Plan
- Lead Controls Selection Chart
Section 2: Writing a Site Specific
Compliance Program
Section 3: Implementing
- Managing the Control Plan
- Making the Control Plan Work
Section 4: Evaluating
Section 5: Infosheets for
Commonly Used Controls
Section 6: Checklists
Checklist 1: Site Inspection (for all controls)
Checklist 2: Cleaning Up Debris with HEPA Vacuum
Checklist 3: Paint Removal Chemical Stripper/Shrouded Tool
Miniaturized Checklist 1: Site Inspection
Why institute an engineering and work practice control program?
- Worker exposure can be reduced or eliminated by:
- engineering controls, such as a process change (e.g. mechanical
dismantling of steel structures instead of torch cutting or using tools
fitted with a vacuum attachment).
- work practice controls (e.g. removing paint before using an
oxyacetylene torch).
- a combination of engineering and work practice controls.
- The OSHA Lead in Construction Standard requires that:
- contractors use engineering and work practice controls to reduce
exposure to the lowest practical level.
- all lead disturbing tasks and selected controls are documented in a written compliance program.
- Owners may require a lead control program be included in project
submittal documents.
Overview of the Tasks
1. Planning
a) Select a Lead Program Manager
b) Identify lead disturbing tasks
c) Select control methods
d) Develop a lead compliance program
2. Writing a site specific program
3. Implementing
a) Managing the control plan
b) Making the control plan work
4. Evaluating
a) Assess effectiveness of controls
— This Guide will elaborate on these tasks —
Owner issues bid documents with specifications for worker protection
from lead.
Bid awarded; contract includes provisions for lead control plan.
Contractor develops initial compliance program.
Project starts. Interim controls in place; contractor develops site-specific lead
health & safety program; engineering and work practice controls in place.
Owner and contractor Lead Program Manager (LPM) review blood lead
and air monitoring results. Lead Competent Person makes frequent and
regular site inspections.
Contractor assesses effectiveness of controls and tries other strategies if
necessary. Updates compliance program.
Project complete. LPM reviews effectiveness of controls. Owner modifies
specifications for future projects, if necessary.
Planning the engineering and work practice control program is part and
parcel of project planning. A timeline for the planning stage looks
something like this:
Owner issues bid documents with specifications for worker protection from lead.
Bid awarded; contract includes provisions for lead control plan. Contractor develops initial OSHA compliance program.
Who is responsible for planning
- Can be any of the following:
- Project planners
- Managers
- Company health and safety officer
- Lead Program Manager (LPM)
- Lead Competent Person
- Union superintendent
What plans need to be made
- Assign a LPM/competent person to organize and run the program
(usually assigned by central office or project manager)
- Identify lead disturbing tasks
- Select one or several control options for each task. See the Lead
Control Selection Chart below
- On most rehabilitation projects a combination of controls may be
necessary. For instance, abrasive blasting might be used for paint
removal in areas where mechanical removal is not effective.
- When selecting controls consider site-specific factors and schedules.
For instance: chemical strippers must be left to work for a specified
amount of time before they are removed; some chemical strippers
may not be effective in cold weather.
- Prepare a Compliance Program.
When to plan
- Selection of lead controls should be included in project design phase
- OSHA requires that the compliance program be in place before lead
disturbing activities begin
Lead Controls Selection Chart
Task |
Control Options |
| Torch Cutting |
- Remove paint before torch cutting
- Substitute mechanical dissembling when
feasible
- Use hydraulic/pneumatic shears or chop
saw when applicable
- Distancing
|
| Rivet Busting |
- Remove paint before rivet busting
- Encapsulate paint
- Clean surfaces and surrounding areas with
HEPA vacuums
|
| Surface Preparation |
- Remove paint
- Use vacuum shrouded tools
- Clean surfaces and surrounding areas with
HEPA vacuums
|
| Installation Activities |
- Clean surfaces and surrounding areas with
HEPA vacuum
- Remove paint before using pneumatic tools
which may spread the dust
- Use vacuum shrouded tools
|
Section 1 Notes
- Instituting an engineering and work practice control program goes to the heart of how the work is done. Such a program must be integrated into day-to-day operations. For instance, if paint is to be removed from beams before they are torch cut, paint removal must be scheduled before torch cutting and be reflected in the project timeline.
-
The OSHA Lead Standard
requires that a "competent person" make frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment. It makes sense that the LPM is the competent person.
-
OSHA defines a lead
competent person as an
individual that can identify
lead hazards in the work
place and has the
authority to take corrective
action.
|
The compliance program describes the engineering and work practice controls
used at the site and includes records of compliance activities. The written program
should include:
- Introduction: Project description, scope and schedule of work, location.
- Personnel: Project Manager, Lead Program Manager and/or Lead
Competent Person, industrial hygienist.
- Lead-emitting activities: Describe tasks, equipment, materials used,
work crew.
- Engineering and work practice controls: Describe type of control,
equipment, use and maintenance procedures. Include rationale for
selecting each control and alternative technologies considered.
- Personal air monitoring results: Provide industrial hygiene reports
and air sampling results for lead disturbing activities. Refer to the Guide
for Managing Exposure Assessment
- Schedule: Provide timetable for implementing compliance program.
- Interim controls: Describe respiratory protection and other controls that
will be used for each task. Refer to the Guide for Managing Respiratory
Protection
- Hygiene procedures: Describe protective clothing and equipment,
housekeeping, clean areas, showers, and hand washing stations.
- Worker rotation schedule: (if applicable).
- Notification procedures: Informing other employers on site regarding
potential exposure risks.
Attach the following programs and records:
- Respirator Program: Provide written program and identify program
administrator, include respirator selected for each task, records for
training, fit testing, and medical clearance.
- Training & Information: Training schedule, topics and records.
- Medical Surveillance Program: Include blood lead monitoring
schedule and results.
- Medical Removal Procedures: Include lead-free work assignments,
medical evaluations and return to work criteria.
Section 2 Notes
- Information on controls is available from a variety of sources - see the Resources List
- The written Compliance Program must be revised and updated periodically to reflect the current status of the program
|
Managing the Control Plan
Each of the activities listed below requires periodic inspection of controls and
site tours by the LPM. A timeline for control implementation looks something
like this:
Project starts. Interim controls in place; contractor develops site-specific lead health & safety program; engineering and work practice controls in place.
Owner and contractor LPM review blood lead and air monitoring results. Lead competent person makes frequent and periodic site inspections.
Making the control plan work:
- Check that control equipment and supplies are on site before lead
disturbing tasks begin.
- Train workers and supervisors on how to use control equipment.
- Check that tasks such as paint removal have been performed on
schedule and properly.
- Inspect site frequently to ensure that controls are:
- present at the location where the tasks will be conducted on any
given day
- in operating order
- being used when they should be
- being used properly (provide for additional training if necessary)
- effective (that is controlling dust emissions)
Section 5 contains brief descriptions of commonly used controls for steel-structure rehabilitation.
Section 6 contains Checklists that can be used by the LPM or Lead Competent
Person when conducting daily inspections of the site, as required by OSHA.
Section 3 Notes
- Selecting a control is the first step in protecting workers from lead - making it work is the second. A control program must be closely managed to be effective. For each control selected, the LPM should consider exposure factors, work procedures and should evaluate the effectiveness of the control. Weekly toolbox talks are a good time to review the use of new tools or controls.
-
Caution: Lead disturbing
activities in an enclosed
or confined space may
greatly increase exposure.
|
Evaluating the control program is an ongoing activity as shown in the time
line below.
Contractor assesses effectiveness of controls and tries other strategies if necessary. Updates compliance program.program.
Project complete. LPM reviews effectiveness of controls. Owner modifies specifications for future projects, if necessary.
There are 3 ways to evaluate whether the control program is working:
- Site inspections of the controls – use Checklists in Section 6
- Monitoring worker exposure to airborne lead dust or fume while a
control is being used (see Guide for Managing Exposure Assessment).
- Blood lead monitoring (see Guide for Managing Blood Lead Monitoring).
If the evaluation indicates a potential problem with a control check
these possibilities:
- Control is not appropriate for the job. Seek an alternate control.
- Control is not functioning properly.
- Workers are not using control properly.
Section 4 Notes
- Upon completion of the project, it is advisable to prepare a final effectiveness report for future projects.
|
Distancing

Distancing is a work practice control where the worker "distances" the point of lead emissions from his/her breathing zone: for example an ironworker standing upwind during torch cutting. Distancing is also achieved by using a long demolition torch (up to 6' in length) that positions the worker's breathing zone further away from the cut.
Work procedures:
- Maintain body position upwind.
- Use demolition (long) torch whenever possible.
- Monitor this control very carefully and be sure that appropriate
air-supplied respirators are used.
Potential Problems |
Possible Solutions |
| Change in wind direction or work position may change exposure |
Don adequate respiratory protection |
| May expose workers downwind of torch cutting |
All workers in vicinity must use adequate respiratory protection
Burners and those working in vicinity should be monitored for exposure |
Alternative Demolition Options
for Structural Steel Projects

Mechanical removal of steel is an alternative to torch cutting. Steel
members are disassembled by reversing installation procedures - removing
rivets and bolts first and then uninstalling steel beams. Also, chop saws,
hydraulic shears, or metal cutters can be used.
Work procedures:
- Remove or encapsulate paint in areas where steel will be
cut or unbolted.
- When cutting, stay in the center of cut lines that have been stripped
or encapsulated with protective tape.
- Saw cutting operations work best on flat surfaces with good access.
Train personnel in proper operating and safety practices.
Potential Problems |
Possible Solutions |
| Disassembly slower than torch cutting |
Schedule should reflect time required for safe demolition activities |
| Chop saw, shears not effective on thicker metal |
Chop saws good only for thinner gauge metal. For thicker metal, use hydraulic shears or torches if necessary |
| Ergonomic issues, e.g. work position with saw |
Conduct toolbox talks to review proper use Avoid using tool in awkward positions |
| Safety issues: chop saw |
Machine guarding, never use with guard blocked in open position.
Use proper PPE (e.g. eye protection)
Use only as per manufacturers instructions Ensure all workers are trained in proper use; provide periodic review during toolbox talks. |
Paint Removal: Chemical Stripping

Stripper is applied to steel surface and left in place for 1-24 hours. Paint and
stripper are scraped off and residues are wiped away. Some strippers require
neutralization.
Work procedures:
- Layout cut lines and areas to be treated at least 4" on all sides of the
cut. Wider strips are even better.
- Coordinate location and stripping of cut lines with demolition cut
requirements.
- Cut lines should match front and back side of steel.
- Inspect work prior to demolition activities to ensure that cut lines
are prepared
- Train personnel in proper operating and safety practices
Potential Problems |
Possible Solutions |
| Worker exposure to caustic chemicals |
Train workers
Use proper PPE
Review MSDS before using
Contact manufacturer if there are any questions
(manufacturers contact information included in
MSDS) |
| Scheduling |
Initial schedule should reflect time required for safe application and removal
May not be applicable in all circumstances e.g. weather, manpower |
Paint Removal: Power Tools

Lead paint is removed with power tools equipped with dust collectors prior
to other lead-emitting activities. Small lead particles are collected by a HEPA
vacuum system as they are released by the tools.
Work procedures:
- Layout cut lines and areas to be treated at least 4" on all sides of the cut.
Wider strips are even better.
- Select appropriate tool based on type of surface to be treated.
- Follow manufacturer's instructions for the tools.
- Keep tool shroud flush with the surface for effective results.
- Coordinate paint removal with demolition cut locations and other
requirements of ironwork.
- Inspect work prior to demolition activities to ensure that paint is
removed as specified.
Potential Problems |
Possible Solutions |
| Workers may be exposed to elevated lead levels if HEPA tools not operated properly |
Train workers
Consult manufacturer or vendor for information and/or help with worker training classes |
| Incomplete removal of painted surfaces. Difficulty cleaning irregular surfaces |
Consult manufacturer or vendor for information e.g. special attachments for corners and/or help with worker training classes
Equipment must be maintained properly e.g. replace worn parts, seals, needles in needle gun etc
May need to consider alternative paint removal technique.
Additional training in using control; toolbox talk |
Encapsulation

Rivet heads and steel members are treated with an elastomeric coating
(plastic dip) prior to rivet busting. Duct tape has been used as an encapsulant
for sawcutting. In either case, the coating or tape holds the paint together and
reduces dust generation at point of impact.
Work procedures:
- Coordinate encapsulation with demolition activities.
- Application of encapsulant may be weather dependent.
Potential Problems |
Possible Solutions |
| Encapsulation is not a control for torch cutting or welding. Heat from sawing or torch cutting may ignite encapsulant causing fire and/or release of toxic vapors |
Use different controls for different operations |
| May become brittle and break into small respirable dust particles |
Use different encapsulant
Adopt alternate control technology |
HEPA Vacuum

HEPA vacuum is used for:
- Keeping work areas clear of debris and dust that can become airborne
during work activities.
Potential Problems |
Possible Solutions |
| Vacuum line clogs up and/or vacuuming ineffective |
Use vacuum for smaller size debris and paint chips only, a shovel should be used for larger pieces that may clog the vacuum
Maintain adequate vacuum capacity
Operate vacuum according to manufacturer instructions, make sure HEPA vacuum capacity adequate for the intended operation
Use prefilters to extend the service life of HEPA filters |
| Ergonomic problems, e.g. bending, squatting |
Use wide mouthed and rigid pole attachments to reduce stooping and bending |
| Potential exposure hazard during vacuum bag disposal |
Train personnel in proper operating and safety practices |
Suggestion on using checklists: since these lists are short, they can be made smaller and placed or pasted into
small field notebooks. For instance, Checklist 1 could be miniaturized - see example at end of checklists. They
can also be programmed onto a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant).
CHECKLIST 1. SITE INSPECTION (for all controls)
| Controls are: |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| Available at work location |
|
|
|
| In operating order |
|
|
|
| Used when they should be |
|
|
|
| Used properly (workers trained in their use) |
|
|
|
| Effective in controlling dust emissions |
|
|
|
| Location and cleaning of cut lines coordinated with demolition requirements |
|
|
|
CHECKLIST 2. CLEANING UP DEBRIS WITH HEPA VACUUM
| |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| Vacuum is operated as per manufacturer's instructions |
|
|
|
| Large pieces of debris have been picked up with shovel prior to use of vacuum (so that vacuum doesn't get clogged). |
|
|
|
| Adequate vacuum capacity maintained |
|
|
|
| Prefilters in place |
|
|
|
| Wide mouthed attachments and rigid wands in use. Workers able to operate vacuum without stooping over |
|
|
|
| Collection bags in place, bags disposed of properly |
|
|
|
CHECKLIST 3. Paint Removal Chemical Stripper/Shrouded Tool
| |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| (For chemical stripping) workers applying and removing stripper use appropriate PPE |
|
|
|
| (For vacuum shrouded tools) shroud maintained close to surface |
|
|
|
| Shroud effective in controlling visible dust emissions |
|
|
|
| Area cleaned at least 4" on either side of the cut line |
|
|
|
| Cut lines matching front and back side of steel |
|
|
|
| After cleaning is lead paint visible on surface, how much? |
|
|
|
MINIATURIZED CHECKLIST 1. SITE INSPECTION (for all controls)
| Controls are: |
Y/N |
Problem noted (describe) |
Problem fixed (describe) |
| Available at work location |
|
|
|
| In operating order |
|
|
|
| Used when they should be |
|
|
|
| Used properly (workers trained in their use) |
|
|
|
| Effective in controlling dust emissions |
|
|
|
| Location and cleaning of cut lines coordinated with demolition requirements |
|
|
|
Back to Table of Contents
This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author
and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an
information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of
information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.
© 2004 by The Mount Sinai – Irving J. Selikoff Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine
|
|