|
Reproduced with
permission from Occupational Safety & Health Reporter, Volume 31,
No.43, page 1009, November 1, 2001.
Copyright 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. |
STRASBOURG, France--Legislation
designed to protect millions of workers in Europe from exposure to harmful
mechanical vibrations was approved by the European Parliament Oct 23.
However, the parliament's
vote challenged moves by ministers representing individual governments
to delay full implementation of the measure for up to nine years.
Ministers must now
decide whether to concede to the parliament's demands or to engage in
conciliation negotiations, which are time-limited to six months, on the
final details of the legislation.
A report from the
parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs cites estimates
by the EU Agency for Health and Safety at Work that 24 percent of European
workers are exposed to mechanical vibrations at work, particularly in
mining and extraction industries, construction, manufacturing, and transport
industries.
The European Commission--the
EU's executive body--proposes limits for two categories of vibration:
hand-arm vibration, which can lead to conditions including loss of feeling
in the fingers, permanently impaired feeling and grip, and pain in the
shoulders and limbs; and whole-body vibration, which can contribute to
back problems and premature degeneration of the spinal column
The debate over whether to enact legislation that requires earlier reductions
in exposure or to delay implementation reflects differences in the way individual
states have addressed the problem. Of the 15 EU states, 9 have either adopted
national rules or favor EU regulation. Germany and Denmark are seen as having
the most advanced legislation. Other states, including the UK, still question
the practicality of enforcing tight limits.
As a concession to
its skeptical members, the EU Council of Ministers is seeking transition
periods for implementation of the law. Some of the longest deferrals relate
to use of equipment in agriculture and forestry.
Danish deputy Helle
Thorning-Schmidt, spokeswoman for the employment committee, accepted that
work equipment in these sectors might be replaced at a slower rate than
in other sectors, but she viewed the transition periods as "unjustifiable"--not
least in light of technical developments in the decade since the commission
began drafting its proposals.
A five-year maximum
transition period would be "sufficient," in her view.
The parliament's
plenary vote backed that view--and also called for limits on whole-body
vibration which would be more demanding than those specified in the current
draft, by reference to ISO standards.
Those opposed to tougher limits on whole-body vibrations questioned the
scientific evidence of risk--and warned of dire consequences for industry.
British Liberal Liz
Lynne claimed that harvest operations on European farms would be disrupted
because tractor drivers would be limited to operating between two to four
hours in any eight-hour period.
She also warned of
"tremendous problems ... in engineering, mining, and construction."
But a majority of
members backed the view that the EU has been too slow in tackling workplace
exposure to physical agents in general.
British Labor member
Stephen Hughes said that ideas on legislating against exposure to vibrations
had been around since 1986 when framework legislation on physical agents
was adopted along with detailed legislation on noise hazards.
"Noise [legislation]
was due to be reviewed in 1991," he said. "Here we are, 10 years later,
and no revision ... has been made."
Employment and Social
Affairs Commissioner Anna Diamantopoulou promised that once the vibrations
directive is cleared, she would "push ahead" with further proposals on
exposure to electromagnetic field and waves, optical radiation, and updated
proposals on noise.
For details of
the vibration exposure limits in the current draft compared with those
demanded by the parliament, see Amendment 2 of the legislative vote on
http://www.europarl.eu.int/
under "texts adopted" in "plenary sessions."
The European Parliament in October 2001 approved legislation
to limit exposures of construction workers and others to mechanical vibration,
including hand-arm and whole-body vibration (WBV).
This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author
and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an
information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of
information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.
Copyright © 2001 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., Washington
D.C.
|