|
Road construction
companies pay out some $65 million more for visibility-related injuries
than it would cost them to equip all of their visibility-hazard-exposed
workers with high-visibility apparel. That is the bottom line for road
construction companies, according to figures compiled from the U.S. Bureau
of Labor Statistics (BLS), the National Safety Council (NSC), American
Road and Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA), and ISEA.
How so? Start with
574,000 hazard-exposed road construction workers in the private sector
(ARTBA). Apply a 20% high-visibility apparel usage rate among road construction
workers (ISEA estimate), meaning that 80% (459,200) are not wearing high-visibility
apparel. Multiply that number of workers by the cost each year to equip
each worker with two $25 high-visibility garments ($50), giving a total
cost of $22.96 million to equip with high-visibility apparel all remaining
road construction workers.
Now multiply the
total number of annual visibility-related injuries in road construction,
which is about 2,500 (based on conservative extrapolations from BLS data),
by the $35,300 cost per nonfatal motor-vehicle injury (NSC), yielding
a total cost for visibility-related injuries in road construction of $88.25
million. Subtract the $22.96 million cost of equipping all unprotected
workers from that figure to derive the $65 million more that road construction
companies pay out each year for visibility-related injuries.
"Wearing high-visibility
apparel will not protect against every potential visibility-related injury
or fatality, and we are not suggesting that it would," said ISEA
President Dan Shipp. "But this data does suggest that road construction
companies are spending a whole lot more to cover the costs of visibility-related
injuries each year than they would pay to equip their workers properly
and make sure they are wearing their high-visibility apparel." For
details on the statistical basis of this cost-benefit analysis, contact
ISEA's Joe Walker, (703) 525-1695 or jwalker@safetyequipment.org.
This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author
and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an
information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of
information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.
|