|
| Jim Morris cannot
be reached at the Chronicle. If you have questions about these reports,
contact CPWR – Center for Construction Research and Training, 301-578-8500. |
In 1989, a young
doctor disturbed by the number of lead-poisoned ironworkers and painters
she was seeing approached the Connecticut Department of Transportation
with a novel idea: Why not hold state contractors closely accountable
for the health of workers on bridge-rehabilitation jobs?
The first response
from the state was, in effect, "We already are." Indeed, state
contracts contained broad language requiring contractors to follow all
applicable rules established by the federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration.
At the time, however,
OSHA had a lenient rule governing lead in construction. And even if the
rule had been stricter, Dr. Kathleen Maurer -- an internist, occupational
medicine specialist
and associate research scientist at the Yale University School of Medicine
-- had seen enough lead-damaged patients to conclude that worker health
wasn't a high priority with most contractors.
Maurer's crusade
paid off in 1990, when the Connecticut Road Industry Surveillance Project
(CRISP) was born. The concept is simple: Any contractor that does a state
bridge job must submit its workers to baseline and annual physical examinations
and frequent blood tests to ensure that they are not being overexposed
to lead through abrasive blasting, burning or mechanical chipping of old
paint. This is plainly spelled out in the contract.
"If you don't
put that language in, the companies that try to do the right thing cannot
successfully bid for jobs because they have higher costs," Maurer
said.
Under CRISP rules,
any worker with a blood-lead level of 35 micrograms per deciliter or higher
must be removed from lead exposure immediately and assigned to a safer
area. OSHA's lead-in-construction rule, adopted after a congressional
mandate in 1993, does not require removal until a worker's blood-lead
level reaches 50 micrograms. "That's way too high," Maurer said.
In fact, a Connecticut
bridge worker with a blood-lead level as low as 25 micrograms draws rapid
CRISP intervention -- at least a telephone call to the contractor's office
and perhaps a site visit, complete with air monitoring and training. Every
bridge job must have showers, sinks and changing facilities so workers
can rid themselves of lead dust before they go home.
CRISP doesn't rely
on contractors to perform medical surveillance. Rather, the blood-testing
and physicals are done through a network of 20 clinics and one laboratory
affiliated with the project, funded by the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health.
Early data are in,
and CRISP appears to be having a profound effect. Of the 680 workers in
the state monitoring system in 1993, only nine had blood-lead levels of
40 micrograms or higher. Seven of the nine came from other states or were
working on non-bridge jobs when they were overexposed.
Maurer sees no reason
why a CRISP-like program couldn't work in other states -- even large ones
like Texas, where 18 major bridge-rehab jobs have been done since 1991
-- although the cost could be considerable.
"Health and
safety is not free," Maurer said. "Neither is nerve damage.
Neither are reproductive problems."
This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author
and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an
information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of
information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.
|