Other Job Site Trade Hazard Site Map Search Spanish Items Help Links Contact eLCOSH Non-English Materials Training Materials NIOSH Home CDC Home eLCOSH Home
Interventions to Reduce Back Injuries in Masonry - TIP SHEET PDF Version CPWR - The Center for Construction Research and Training
 

Share this using: |


Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Problem

  • Bricklayers have the highest rate of back injuries with lost workdays among construction workers.

    brick layer

  • The work performed by bricklayers is physically demanding due to the weight of materials handled, the use of their hands to install, position, move and manipulate materials and equipment, and their working conditions.
  • Laying block creates risks for shoulder and low back pain and injuries due to:

    • √ block weight;
      √ frequency of lifting materials and twisting;
      √ height of work and materials; and
      √ distance of work from workers.

  • A study of ergonomic best practices in the masonry industry found that while products, equipment and work practices are available to reduce the rate of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among masonry workers, they have not been widely adopted.

Solutions

The following are two of the “best practices” identified by masonry industry stakeholders to eliminate or greatly reduce the risks associated with laying block.

Studies and surveys of masonry contractors have found that use of these interventions can lead to productivity improvements, and a reduction in the number of neck and shoulder and injuries.

1. H-Block - is an open ended concrete masonry unit (CMU) that allows bricklayers to place CMU block around rebar, pipes and other vertical obstructions (pictured below).

The H-block design eliminates the need to lift the CMU above shoulder level reducing the risk for back and shoulder injuries. Contractors who use H-Block often, particularly when there is frequent vertical rebar, noted an increase in productivity (pictured below).

Laying CMU over rebar VS. Laying H-Block around rebar
Laying CMU over rebar VS. Laying H-Block around rebar

2. Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) – is a light-weight block. The standard size is 8”X8” X24” and weighs roughly 30lbs, but AAC is also available in a variety of other weights and sizes.

autoclaved aerated concrete

AAC is handled with two hands, and uses a thinbed mortar (ASTM C1660-09). Using AAC, or other lightweight block, reduces strain and loading on bricklayers’ backs, and lowers their risk of developing low back pain and injuries.

In addition, studies have found an increase in productivity when using lighter weight blocks.

Bricklayers laying brick

Conclusions

There are many viable ergonomics solutions available to reduce shoulder and back injuries among bricklayers, but these innovations are underutilized. To increase their use, the industry must inform and involve the key players:

  • Designers, structural engineers and architects who influence the building materials specified;

  • Masonry contractors who make the equipment decisions, and can influence the choice of materials used; and

  • Workers who play an active role in deciding how best to implement a new material, piece of equipment or work practice.

To Learn More Visit

Press Release: “Researchers Identify Incentives and Barriers to Adoption of Back- Saving Best Practices among Masonry Contractors”: http://www.cpwr.com/whatsnew.html

“Two-mason Lift Team” -- see workers in action at: www.elcosh.org/en/video/20/a000048/two-masonlift- technique.html.

“CPWR Construction Solutions” a database of information on safety and health hazards and practical control measures to address those hazards: www.cpwrconstructionsolutions.org

The “Electronic Library of Construction Safety and Health” (eLCOSH) a collection of information on construction safety and health issues, including ergonomics: www.elcosh.org

This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.

Research for this report was funded by CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training, using grant U54 OH008307 from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH.

CPWR is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research and training institution created by the Building and Construction Trades Department (BCTD), AFL-CIO, and serves as the research arm of the BCTD. CPWR provides safety and health research and information for the construction trades and industry. For more information, visit www.cpwr.com.

© 2010, CPWR – The Center for Construction Research and Training. All rights reserved.