Other Job Site Trade Hazard Site Map Search Spanish Items Help Links Contact eLCOSH Non-English Materials Training Materials NIOSH Home CDC Home eLCOSH Home
UC Ergonomics/Safe Pavement Breakers Presentation PDF Version PPT Version
 

Share this using: |

Diana J. Flores, Michael Lopez
University of California, Berkeley, University of California, Los Angeles

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

jackhammer use truck jackhammer

Background

  • In construction…
    • 5 out of every 100 workers injured
    • >50% of injuries = Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs)
  • Jackhammering causes back and shoulder MSDs
  • Stuck jackhammer = increased strain
  • Looking for a solution to help prevent MSDs

jackhammer use

  • Jackhammer Lift Assist
  • Pneumatically powered “foot” pushes jackhammer out of the ground
  • Reduces effort of lifting/repositioning jackhammer
  • Decreases back and shoulder strain

jackhammer use

  • Lift Assist available to workers at PG&E
  • Workers prefer not to use device

pacifc fas and electric company

Objective

  • Find out why many workers prefer traditional method of jackhammering

jackhammer cartoon

Methods

  • Site visits at PG&E (2)
  • Worker interviews (4)
  • Worker Questionnaires (4)
  • Interviews with Ergonomist and Construction experts
  • Interview with PG&E union rep (IBEW 1245)
  • Visited Northern California Laborer’s Training Center in San Ramon

 

hardhatWhat we learned

THE GOOD:

  • Helpful on flat, open ground
  • Reduces back and shoulder strain
  • Well accepted once workers give it a try

THE BAD:

  • Not appropriate for all situations (hills, limited space)
  • Decreases accuracy of work
  • Large reach for activation trigger Adds 10lbs weight

jackhammer

Evaluation

It’s a good idea, but it needs some work

-PG&E construction worker

Recommendations

  • Decrease activation trigger reach
  • Decrease weight of device
  • Modify foot such that it conforms to sloped surfaces

jackhammer use

  • Larger storage compartment for device
  • Put jackhammer away as a team when possible
  • Conduct periodic safety training for individual work crews on jackhammer risks and precautions.
  • Incorporate Lift Assist into initial jackhammer trainings

jackhammer use

jackhammer use

Challenges

  • Project time limitation
  • Small Sample Size
  • Not much literature specific to Jackhammer MSDs
  • Jackhammer injuries not limited to MSDs

signs

Issues

  • Noise
  • Vibration
  • Road Traffic
  • Silica Dust
noise traffic

Successes

  • Cooperative PG&E liaisons and crews
  • Interviews with ergonomics and construction experts
  • Sufficient videotape footage
  • Understanding additional construction work hazards that we were not previously aware of.

Acknowledgements

UC Ergonomics Lab

  • Maggie Robbins
  • Dr. David Rempel
  • Betsy Llosa
  • Staff

CA. Dept. of Public Health

  • Dr. Bob Harrison
  • David Harrington
  • Staff

Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics

Occupational Health Internship Program

  • Diane Bush
  • Sarah Jacobs

PG&E

  • Garret Chang
  • Taisir Shurasa
  • Work Crews

Northern CA. Laborer’s Training Center

  • Ollie Hurl
  • Jerome Williams

workers

Questions?

This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.