|
After an ironworker fell to his death on the job in Boston in June 1995,
OSHA cited the contractor for an "egregious" violation, the most serious
one on the books, and proposed a penalty of $448,000. But such a fine would
have put the company out of business and could have cost 30 union jobs.
Saugus Construction Corporation, the steel erection contractor, netted $271,000
in 1995.
Instead, the union
asked OSHA to reconsider the penalty and address a safer worksite for
the workers. OSHA (the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration)
and the contractor agreed. The fine was cut to $200,000 and Saugus now
has a major 5-year safety program. The company is spending about $90,000
yearly on employing an independent safety inspector and on equipment and
training. While many OSHA fines are cut by half or more, this settlement
ensured a full-scale fall-protection program.
Having a "monetary
penalty is important," said Stephen Cooper, executive director, safety
and health, for the ironworkers' union. "But safety and health improvement
at the workplace comes first."
Cooper and others
have asked OSHA to use a similar approach to other safety violations,
if a contractor agrees.
Until Saugus was
cited for "failing to provide fall protection," the company had never
been cited by OSHA. Egregious violations — there were 6 in the US that
year — are usually for multiple "willful" violations. And, compared with
non-union firms, the Saugus fine looked out of line.
This paper appears in the eLCOSH website with the permission of the author
and/or copyright holder and may not be reproduced without their consent. eLCOSH is an
information clearinghouse. eLCOSH and its sponsors are not responsible for the accuracy of
information provided on this web site, nor for its use or misuse.
|